| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1930
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 00:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
"You may not submit any content to any chat room or other public forum within the Game that is harassing, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, libelous or defamatory, encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense or give rise to civil liabilities, or is unlawful in any other way, including without limitation the submission of content that infringes on a third-partyGÇÖs intellectual property rights."
I think this should cover actions originating "within the Game" before being moved out of game onto a private team speak. It sets CCP for legal action and shouldn't be allowed. Especially when its then moved from the private TS back onto the EvE forums where its published to the public. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1930
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 01:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Gwydion Voleur wrote:Seven Koskanaiken wrote:I don't see how anyone with a straight face can use the words torture, victim, etc in relation to a game that you voluntarily play, where the items and actions aren't real, and you can leave at any time you want. You can block/ignore anyone you want, close down TS any time. This is post #15 on page 1 of a 72 page threadnought, and should have ended the discussion. Is this the way I play EvE, or the way 99.9% of everyone else plays? No, thankfully. It's pretty despicable. But it's not actionable, or illegal, or the result of anything but the stupidity and greed of the sad sack on the receiving end. Caveat emptor. *EDIT* Sorry it's now up to 73 pages, and counting. Because some people see themselves and others as victims IMO. Where some of us see "dude, you could have just stopped", others see" omg poor dude they tortured you that's so sad". I think the so sad people are enablers for people who don't think. I expect to at least see new guidelines from CCP about this sort of thing. If that doesn't happen you'll be happy to know I'll be cancelling my 8 existing subs and playing something else. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1930
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 01:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jim Era wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: I expect to at least see new guidelines from CCP about this sort of thing. If that doesn't happen you'll be happy to know I'll be cancelling my 8 existing subs and playing something else.
Can I have your stuff? x8? Nah. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1930
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 02:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Then why didn't he leave the conversation? Its irrelevant. Mail him and ask yourself if you wish for an answer to that question. None of what happened in the TS "Bonus Room" is any of CCPs concern or business. What is of concern to CCP and the community at large, is Erotica1s activities of actively predating on the community for victims with ingame scams that he extends to OUTSIDE THE GAME. You cant do that. Its against the EULA. Scams are fine within the game, it is NOT ok to scam people OUTSIDE the game. Does CCP really have jurisdiction outside of the game? They have a responsibility to their users to exercise due care and diligence. If they are aware that a player (erotica 1) is deliberately targeting vulnerable players, using the game to manipulate them into going onto teamspeak to be subjected to humiliation, bullying and harassment to the extent that the player could potentially harm themselves or cause harm to others then they have a responsibility to deal with that since its originating in game.
There is also a section in the EULA which deals with criminal acts. Recording and publishing information that should be private, as in private conversations is defamation, is a breach of privacy. You cannot record a private conversation and publish that conversation on the EvE forums without breaking the law. The person must be told they are being recorded and the person must give consent to that recording being published.
If Erotica 1 was using a 3rd party website to lure victims for its sick game then that'd be different but he is using in game and the EvE O forums.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1930
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 02:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
EI Digin wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:There is also a section in the EULA which deals with criminal acts. Recording and publishing information that should be private, as in private conversations is defamation, is a breach of privacy. You cannot record a private conversation and publish that conversation on the EvE forums without breaking the law. The person must be told they are being recorded and the person must give consent to that recording being published. I don't think you know how the law works. I'm a qualified paralegal. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1931
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 02:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Shizuken wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:
Recording and publishing information that should be private, as in private conversations is defamation, is a breach of privacy. You cannot record a private conversation and publish that conversation on the EvE forums without breaking the law.
Indeed. It violates nearly every US wiretap statute. Not if you say you consent to being recorded and are aware that the recording may be posted to social media sites. This happens in... every... Bonus Round. Consent is only valid if its given freely and without coercion. Since the method is to remove a persons virtual property and using that as a means of obtaining the consent that consent is not given freely and so its voided. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1931
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
EI Digin wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Consent is only valid if its given freely and without coercion. Since the method is to remove a persons virtual property and using that as a means of obtaining the consent that consent is not given freely and so its voided.
Does this mean I can get my bitcoins back??? I have no idea about your bitcoins. There are exceptions to consent and coercion. Banks requiring you to sign a contract which gives them right to penalize you with late fee's or otherwise not allowing you to open an account I guess is coercion. Even though you don't agree with the late fee's being unable to open an account, which is a requirement to live coerces you into signing the agreement for example.
But I don't think that applies to the consent to publish embarrassing and humiliating material on a public forum or you lose all your stuff. I think that'd be a hard one to get past a magistrate or judge if you were sued. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1931
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:12:00 -
[8] - Quote
EI Digin wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:EI Digin wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Consent is only valid if its given freely and without coercion. Since the method is to remove a persons virtual property and using that as a means of obtaining the consent that consent is not given freely and so its voided.
Does this mean I can get my bitcoins back??? I have no idea about your bitcoins. There are exceptions to consent and coercion. Banks requiring you to sign a contract which gives them right to penalize you with late fee's or otherwise not allowing you to open an account I guess is coercion. Even though you don't agree with the late fee's being unable to open an account, which is a requirement to live coerces you into signing the agreement for example. But I don't think that applies to the consent to publish embarrassing and humiliating material on a public forum or you lose all your stuff. I think that'd be a hard one to get past a magistrate or judge if you were sued. When you quit the game, are you going to stop posting? Because that will truly spark another era of eve-o general forum posting. Pretty sure that when you quit the game you are unable to post so the question is pretty redundant... much like yourself :) Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1931
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 11:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote:Alyth Nerun wrote:Everyone in this thread should just take a step back, maybe drink a glass of water and calm down.
I really have a hard time to understand how anyone can call this cyberbullying or torture with a straight face. After all we are talking about game characters here and not about an attack on a persons real life. Everyone who can't see that difference has lost his perspective and can't separate fiction from reality anymore and should probably stay away from this kind of RPG.
I hope this thread gives Erotica 1 the publicity to get elected to the CSM and replace Reta.. sorry, Ripart Teg.
Erotica 1 4 CMS9 What part of the TS happened in game? If you had the guts to listen to that sound cloud part you would think twice about reality and fiction. The bullying was real and so the threads sent back at the sociopaths, but it all happened out of game so it's ok, right? There is a tremendous difference between "OK" and "Problem CCP should address". If you start requiring CCP to police actions that occur off of CCPs servers, you open a huge can of very easily exploitable worms. Example: "CCP, please ban Alyth. Here's a public TS recording of him being racist and evil. His denial (with a different voice) means nothing, he could get anyone to read a script for him." You don't need to require CCP to police actions out of game. This occurred in game to a logged in EvE player, and involved in game assets being transferred to another player. It then was posted on the forums. Whether the communication was in text in local or on teamspeak is irrelevant. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1933
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 11:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Bjurn Akely wrote:Frankly I doubt you care. Nobody cares. This is a vendetta against Erotica 1. Hence why people are simply dismissing his threats of violence and racism of Sokhar as if they were 'justified'. They're not. But no one is hanging him by the neck with anywhere near the same passion that they're going after Ero. This is a witchhunt, straight outta the 16th Century, run by the 'morality police' like a religious inquisition. Its more a vendetta against what they did to the guy and his wife. Its a message to both CCP and Erotica and like minded people that the majority of people find this sort of thing unacceptable. Its a necessary message.
While I would love to see people banned I don't think personally that a ban should be implemented simply because this behavior has been if not condoned, accepted by CCP and I think even if you're as low brow and despicable as this person likes to portray themselves as, fair warning should be given before a ban.
I think its time for CCP to simply say "use your brains, if you step over the line too far you'll be in trouble". It doesn't take genius to figure out what should be acceptable and what shouldn't be.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1936
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 11:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:I am a CEO of a CODEdot corporation who requires Code compliancy in the bonus rounds, which are being called all sorts terrible names right now, yet you have clear and irrefutable evidence linked by me of thousands of hateful, racist, and otherwise vile comments throw around.
The only misdirection is away from your witch hunt and toward the heart of the matter. You really can't play the victim card when your actions are aimed at seeking those hateful comments. That's what your goal seems to be, to garner hate and anger from your victims... Don't like it, then stop doing it. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1938
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 11:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:I'm going to do something I knew I should have done hours ago... get a couple hours of sleep. Don't worry, I'll bookmark my place. Enjoy your sleep Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1940
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 12:26:00 -
[13] - Quote
Clara Pond wrote:Icylce wrote: 1.Erotica1 knows that there is high chance that he will get insulted by eveplayer if he does something considered "evil"(link to minerbumping + empyric experiece from various scams). 2. Erotica1 scams person, then puts him into bonus round. 3. Erotica1 puts the player in bonus round in helpless state (takes all assets) and aplies psychical pressure. 4. Erotica1 is surprised when said person breaks and insults him. Conclusion: I can't read.
1. Ero engineers a game with complex rules that is designed to be hard but not impossible to win 2. Person qualifies for a bonus round (higher stakes, harder version of game) for any of a number of reasons including 100th client 3. Ero plays the game with the client in some cases for six hours after he has all their assets, thus debunking any possibility it is a scam 4. Ero is completely unsurprised when a majority can't complete the deliberately complex game, and uses their losses to pay out the small number of winners as well as making a profit, the majority of which is donated to the New Order 5. Blogger throws a losing client under his publicity bus to wage a hilariously melodramatic and over-reached vendetta against gameplay he personally considers distasteful, alongside the many other gameplay elements he considers distasteful.
 Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1942
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 15:56:00 -
[14] - Quote
Iso Anneto wrote:Destitute Tehol Beddict wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:He consents to both. Please explain to me EXACTLY how you come to this conclusion. Be as specific as possible. He says he consents to both. There's really no wrangling your way out this, it's plainly stated on the recording, so I'm done responding to this asinine line of argument. But as a sorted of deleted-scene-DVD-extra, here's what I would have said if, by some magic, you could demonstrate that the client did not say what he said - who cares? CCP are not the police, and neither are we, and a grey-area TS recording is nothing to do with either. He consents to recording while being recorded... That makes lots of sense? You sound like you're supporting E1 there, since that statement says that he consented out of the recording because if he didn't, he would've known they were recording and told them not to, but we heard nothing like that. There's no consent with coercion. Obviously after having his stuff taken and fearing if he didn't do what they said and agreed to what they asked they would not return it there was coercion. No consent at all.
Really irrelevant though unless he sues them. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1942
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 15:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Iso Anneto wrote:Seriously people? This guy could at ANY time leave the channel. He even knew what was going on (he said he did in TS anyway), he could have left, he stayed because he wanted the money, it's his fault he was "tortured", simply because he was greedy. If he had cut his losses or not been greedy, he could've avoided all of this. Pure greed is the cause. And E1 Beijing insane, but mostly greed. Exactly. While I don't aggree with the level of what Erotica1 did, I will fight to the death for his right to do it. Sandbox remember? (also, see: freedom of speech parallel) What's really pathetic here is touchy feely pansies like Ripard Teg are using this event as a soapbox to try and validate his carebear-loving ways, and assuage his personal moral outrage -- by going to the extreme of calling for nerfs or changes to the TOS. Know what Ripard, if you are so upset why not put money where mouth is and UNSUB to go play WoW with the other pansies? No no no... Elitist's like Ripard don't counter sandbox events like this by directly helping the 'victim' with ISK donations, or calling for donations to the victim as remedy and calling it a day...NO, elitist Tzars from on high always insist on changing *your game* based on *their feelings*. I weep for the fact HTFU in EvE is dying a death of 1,000 cuts unchallenged, because activist pansies like Ripard and Trebor are on the CSM. tldr; Don't tell Erotica1 or anyone how to play their game. EvE is a sandbox, or its not. CCP's (non) response to this event should be speaking volumes, and the thunderous silence a HTFU b!tch-slap to pansies like Ripard et al. F Except if CCP continues to allow this to occur and someone self harms because of it they could be vicariously liable so they can't just ignore it. In some areas what they did is a criminal offence so its hardly a matter of freedom. You don't have freedom to abuse and vilify people. You agree to give up those freedoms in exchange for the rule of law. If you want to live in anarchy perhaps Afghanistan is a better place for you? Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1942
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 16:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Can somebody please remind me how many times Sohkar left the Bonus Room....only to return?
And this question would be directed to those who actually listened to the recording in its entirety...not the sheeple who just read the blog and are therefore experts in this situation.... Relevance?
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1946
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 16:18:00 -
[17] - Quote
Capt Starfox wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Can somebody please remind me how many times Sohkar left the Bonus Room....only to return?
And this question would be directed to those who actually listened to the recording in its entirety...not the sheeple who just read the blog and are therefore experts in this situation.... Relevance? You serious? Absolutely. Its irrelevant. But its a nice attempt to shift the blame from the people who did do the wrong thing onto the victim. Actually, not its pretty transparent and a bad attempt.
Somebody took his stuff, granted it was just pixels, however that's irrelevant. Whats relevant is a number of people deliberately set out to humiliate and embarrass another person without any regard for them at all. They also made fun of him because he had a speech impediment which is vilification based on disability. There are a lot of things wrong with what they did and your pathetic attempts to try to justify the behavior is, well, pathetic.
Also relevant is if it happened again and a more imbalanced person was deliberately targeted and treated the same way causing that person to harm themselves then CCP would likely be liable in part since they are now fully aware of whats occurring and doing nothing would be pretty stupid from a legal point of view.
CCP has nothing to gain by allowing this behavior to continue and potentially a lot to lose.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1947
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 16:30:00 -
[18] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Also relevant is if it happened again and a more imbalanced person was deliberately targeted and treated the same way causing that person to harm themselves then CCP would likely be liable in part since they are now fully aware of whats occurring and doing nothing would be pretty stupid from a legal point of view. Literally exactly this could be said about blowing up ships in EVE. No it couldn't. In EvE you expect your ship to get blown up. Even if a person did self harm because their ship got blown up CCP couldn't reasonably be expected to foresee that occurring since its very unlikely to happen and out of CCP's control.
However CCP could reasonably be expected to foresee self harm occurring from Erotica type scams and there are very easy methods of preventing that from occurring as best they can - making it against the rules.
It comes down to reasonably foreseeable events and the practicality of prevention. Since both are within CCP's scope then CCP could conceivably be liable for not acting. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1947
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 16:41:00 -
[19] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Katkon Darnok wrote:Batelle wrote:lollerwaffle wrote:I'm confused about the term 'cyber bullying' Cyberbullying is a thing for sure, but this isn't it. For one, it is extremely difficult to walk away from most cyberbullying, as its typically carried out by real-life acquaintances, and thus it is easy to pursue the victim across various media platforms. Unlike this situation, which was a single event between complete strangers with more than adequate tools to end any and all contact from the other party. The US government (and I) would disagree with your nuanced definition. Here's what is posted as a definition on stopbullying.gov (didn't even know that website existed until I googled the definition): " Cyberbullying is bullying that takes place using electronic technology. Electronic technology includes devices and equipment such as cell phones, computers, and tablets as well as communication tools including social media sites, text messages, chat, and websites. Examples of cyberbullying include mean text messages or emails, rumors sent by email or posted on social networking sites, and embarrassing pictures, videos, websites, or fake profiles." No mention of "typically carried out by acquaintances" (stated) or "easy to walk away from" (implied). Hmm, what is "bullying" then? Let's see.... stopbullying.gov wrote: Bullying Definition:
Bullying is unwanted, aggressive behavior among school aged children that involves a real or perceived power imbalance.
Irrelevant that the US hasn't updated its definition of bullying. They have however in many of the states in the US passed or are intending to pass workplace bullying laws so obviously the definition only applying to "school age children" is incorrect.
In any case whatever you want to call it, its the actions not the word that is important. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1947
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 16:43:00 -
[20] - Quote
One Eyed Runner wrote:Cyberbullying
Legal definition
Cyberbullying is defined in legal glossaries as actions that use information and communication technologies to support deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior by an individual or group, that is intended to harm another or others. use of communication technologies for the intention of harming another person use of internet service and mobile technologies such as web pages and discussion groups as well as instant messaging or SMS text messaging with the intention of harming another person.
Examples of what constitutes cyberbullying include communications that seek to intimidate, control, manipulate, put down, falsely discredit, or humiliate the recipient. The actions are deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior intended to harm another. Cyberbullying has been defined by The National Crime Prevention Council: GÇ£When the Internet, cell phones or other devices are used to send or post text or images intended to hurt or embarrass another person."[5][6]
A cyberbully may be a person whom the target knows or an online stranger. A cyberbully may be anonymous and may solicit involvement of other people online who do not even know the target. This is known as a 'digital pile-on.
That's pretty much spot on for what Erotica and its 'friends' did. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1949
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 05:00:00 -
[21] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Erica Dusette wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote: Tell me how that matters you stupid ****.
Fact is a significant number of military personnel commit suicide, as well as police, Fire, and Emergency Responders... and it sure as hell ain't because they are in physical pain.
How many of them killed themselves because someone took their pixels and laughed about it? The thing is it's not really about pixels. It's the time, or real money, that people have invested into those pixels that lends them to becoming emotional. And the people who use this to their advantage are very much aware of this fact.  So, if I lose on the last level of Mario Brothers, instead of the first level, that's when I can get a free pass on making death threats and yelling obscene racist things? Because I invested time into that, right? This is a videogame, first, last, and always. People need to grow up, take control of themselves, and act like adults. If they can't do that, that's no one's problem but their own. The forum it occurred in is irrelevant. The issue is that a number of people deliberately set out to harm someone. Even when they realised they'd accomplished that they continued to harm the person without any consideration for the person. You're missing the entire point, whether it happened on a bus, Facebook, in someone's home or in a video game what they did was unconscionable and in many places is a criminal offence. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1951
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 05:16:00 -
[22] - Quote
Muestereate wrote:Korhaka Mirunas wrote:Dieterlin wrote:Korhaka Mirunas wrote:If we assume the whole conversation happened ingame, what was broken in the EULA? Please show me the paragraph(s) explaining. Section 6, Part A "Specifically Restricted Conduct", Section 5. EULA wrote: You may not submit any content to any chat room or other public forum within the Game that is harassing, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, libelous or defamatory, encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense or give rise to civil liabilities, or is unlawful in any other way, including without limitation the submission of content that infringes on a third-partyGÇÖs intellectual property rights. Ero1 definitely conducted "harassing behavior" outside the scope of normal gameplay, and the victim made threatening comments. Both of them should be banned. The only person to use threats was Sohkar, I have listened to the sound clip from start to finish. Erotica 1 never raised his voice and never threatened anyone, was not obscene, did not harass, was not abusive or defamatory. Eroticas voice is processed, A simple compressor could flatten any and all or just some of Eroticas volume fluctuations Not to mention that Erotica and friends were in control of the situation the entire time. Its part of the manipulation to use a calm tone and to remain calm and collected because it contrasts with the victims out of control manner and removes even more control from the victim. Its why people tell you to take a step back or a deep breath in a conflict situation because it helps in regards to recovering some control.
They're manipulative, that's the whole idea of the bonus round. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1951
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 05:30:00 -
[23] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Kyperion wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Kyperion wrote:Civilization, competition, fair play, social cooperation and the Rule of Law, or a clown show of immaturity,
What does CCP and the larger EVE community want this game to become?
A sandbox. The 'sandbox' analogy is trite, overused and does not answer the question. Yes it does. It answers it perfectly. It's not even an analogy, it's an actual conclusive answer. I don't think you even know the meaning of the word analogy. You want civilisation? You can make one, cuz it's a sandbox. You want competition? Create it, cuz it's a sandbox. You want fair play? Balance it, cuz it's a sandbox. You want social cooperation? Create the content that requires it, it's a sandbox. You want a clown show? Then stage one, cuz it's a sandbox. The 'character' of the game is created by the players. I don't need anyone to conform to crap because I'm playing my own game with my own goals. You should try doing that yourself and stop trying to get everyone to conform to your 'infinite moral superiority' and you might enjoy the game more. The question itself is poorly phrased, because it limits EVE to only a few possibilities, but EVE is more than you give it credit for. That's why you fail. The most amusing thing about this post is that you actually think its reasonable. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1951
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 05:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote:Everyone knows emotional pain is real, and depending on what it is can be worse than physical pain.
Being made fun of on the internet is not, in any way shape or form, analogous to real torture. Ever. I don't care if you lose your space pixels or not. Of course it can be analogous to real torture. Not the sword in the fire with a back drop of an iron maiden type of torture. We'll leave that for the fantasy film buffs to cream over. No: It's more analogous to what is now called enhanced interrogation in the halls of polite and fluffy govt ivory towers. And I should mention that the phrase 'being made fun of' belittles what's actually happening. You can drive the right person to slit their wrists with words alone if your grasp of social manipulation is twisted enough. Or you can bring some right up to that point and then back off to do it over and over until they snap. How many links would you like to tragic ends for people that have been 'made fun of' on the internet. Twenty? Fifty? One hundred? I can link them. Mr Epeen  Indeed. That's why we have a law in Australia called Brodies Law. The 'fun' caused someone so much pain and suffering they took their own life. Easily equivalent to torture, just not physical torture. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1951
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 05:35:00 -
[25] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote:Everyone knows emotional pain is real, and depending on what it is can be worse than physical pain.
Being made fun of on the internet is not, in any way shape or form, analogous to real torture. Ever. I don't care if you lose your space pixels or not. Of course it can be analogous to real torture. Not the sword in the fire with a back drop of an iron maiden type of torture. We'll leave that for the fantasy film buffs to cream over. No: It's more analogous to what is now called enhanced interrogation in the halls of polite and fluffy govt ivory towers. And I should mention that the phrase 'being made fun of' belittles what's actually happening. You can drive the right person to slit their wrists with words alone if your grasp of social manipulation is twisted enough. Or you can bring some right up to that point and then back off to do it over and over until they snap. How many links would you like to tragic ends for people that have been 'made fun of' on the internet. Twenty? Fifty? One hundred? I can link them. Mr Epeen  I can also tell you, that its not just 'being made fun of' that can validly be related to torture. I love my Wife, I pray every day that we die on the same day, but I can tell you right now, If either one of us survives the other... for a very long time that would feel like 'torture'... The emotional pain of living beyond someone you love... or even being seperated from them.. that is real, and it hurts. I doubt that Kaarous Aldurald or Remiel Pollard have reached the age when the pain of death has stung their lives. Either that or they lack all sense of human empathy and truly are lost. I'm betting on the latter. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1955
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 06:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
It's not the pixels that are the issue. The issue is a number of subcribed EvE players are singling out other subscribed EvE players in game, using the game client, getting them to gamble their stuff and then using that EvE virtual property as leverage to coerce them onto a team speak server where they are humiliated and harassed. They then post the recorded conversation on EvE forums to further humiliate that player.
We have already established the EULA prohibits that behaviour. They're clearly using both the server and forums to harass and embarrass, they are clearly harming CCPs reputation (only have to read popular gaming forums to see the negative posts about EvE and this event popping up).
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1959
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:11:00 -
[27] - Quote
Lazrim wrote:The whole time you guys have been talking here, I've been mining alot of the Veldspar in low sec. I normally can't access. I think I just beat you all at Eve the past two days! Veldspar mining automatically results in disqualification from ever winning EvE. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1959
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:21:00 -
[28] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:getting them to gamble their stuff and then using that EvE virtual property as leverage to coerce them onto a team speak server where they are humiliated and harassed. They then post the recorded conversation on EvE forums to further humiliate that player.
In real life, people choose to go to casinos, even though it is well established that mathematically, the house always wins. It is a loosing game, but greed or other motivations lead them to choose to play. So too here. Every step of the way, the "victim" had a choice. He chose to get his isk doubled, though he suspected a scam. He chose to enter the bonus room. He chose to read the articles provided to him. He chose to sing. He chose to leave. He chose to return. He chose to threaten. He chose to leave again. He chose to return again. You can disagree with his choices, but they were his to make every step of the way. At every step he could stop. And he did, not once, not twice, but thrice. You can say that E1 manipulated him into staying and returning, but that disenfranchises the victim in our analysis. It removes his agency as an actor. You turn him from being a human being to being merely cattle, and I do not believe that is the case here. My opinion of the victim is not so low. Doesn't change the facts - they broke the rules in regards to harassment and harming CCPs reputation.
Regarding the choice thing it's not accurate. You left out the coercive element. You're also ignoring the fact he was deliberately led along a path designed to keep him engaged. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1959
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:33:00 -
[29] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Icylce wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote: Cite the precise rule E1 broke and reread my last, bolded paragraph regarding coercion and manipulation. Please. I didn't ignore it, I attacked it head on. You chose not to read it.
Naive. Sometimes human beeings are turned into puppets. Your seeing things too idealistically. Shrugs off request for citation of relevant reference material, insults the person requesting in instead. I'm noticing a pattern here. Particularly amongst the people on the witchhunt. Already been cited multiple times. You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1959
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:35:00 -
[30] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:lollerwaffle wrote:Erica Dusette wrote:The thing is though that in RL (at least here) Casinos are now bound by law to stop problem gamblers and addicts from gaming when they're spotted. Same with pubs and alcohol - the establishment is ultimately responsible for how drunk they allow someone to become.
We're seeing the same thing creep in online, where the sites are ultimately being asked to take responsibility for people who cannot meter their own interactions within the game. This is the part of RL that I don't agree with. People are beginning to lose all sense of personal responsibility and demanding that other people take responsibility for their actions. Which is wrong. Everyone is responsible for their own actions and choices. This shirking of responsibility and accountability for one's own action is a plague on this world. The laws are there to protect stupid people and their families. Video games don't need these kinds of laws because there is no meaningful consequence where in-game interactions are involved (however we are seeing laws introduced to protect people from real life interactions through digital media). In video games, players are encouraged to screw up and learn from their mistakes and that's exactly what is happening here. The punishment might be harsher than many expect in a video game, but that's what makes the lesson so valuable. It should also teach players to avoid this kind of situation in future, especially in real life. Isn't it a wonderful thing when people can learn important life skills and better themselves through video games? Except we're not talking about in game. This entire sad episode involved a group of EvE players harassing and humiliating another EvE player. It had nothing to do with spaceships at all. It was outright predatory behavior designed and intended to cause harm to another person. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1960
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:37:00 -
[31] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation. Erotica 1 has done neither of those things. Perhaps not in your fantasy world but in the real world she has. Would you like me to link to the forums of the various games forums which are painting EVE players and CCP's premier game as aweful? Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1960
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Already been cited multiple times. You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation. I really think you need to look at the precedent set on that harassment clause. CCP is VERY loose on it. This is by design. One of their game trailers focuses on taking revenge for actions that happened a year before for god's sake. Harassment is harassment. Harming CCP's reputation and the reputation of EvE is harming CCP's reputation and the reputation of EvE. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1960
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Riot Girl wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:You may not harass other players. You may not cause damage to CCP's reputation. Erotica 1 has done neither of those things. Perhaps not in your fantasy world but in the real world she has. Would you like me to link to the forums of the various games forums which are painting EVE players and CCP's premier game as aweful? Then the only person who has damaged CCP's reputation is Ripard Teg, who decided to raise a hue and cry about it to further whatever agenda he's pushing this time. Because it happened a month ago, and no one cared until the puppets were told to cry about it to everyone they could find. The Julian Assange and Edward Snowden defense lol. Shoot the messenger... there would be no message without the actions of Erotica1 and co. The responsibility is firmly in their court unfortunately for them. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1963
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:It was outright predatory behavior designed and intended to cause harm to another person. Was the person harmed? Do you have any evidence to suggest that Erotica's intention was to harm another player? I've known Erotica 1 for quite a while and I believe he has no intention of harming anyone. I've often been quite surprised by his compassion, showing sympathy in situations where I didn't. If anything, Erotica 1 is more of a scapegoat for all of our antics. Erotica 1 is the figurehead and organizer of the operation, but everything that happens in that room aren't his own ideas. The 'mayo pic' episode, well people had their information wrong about that, so I thought people were referring to something else. It was actually peanut butter, not mayo and it wasn't even Erotica's idea. That was actually my idea, except I wanted him to use a marker pen (this was in retaliation to one of Erotica's rivals, who had one of his victims make a sign pic for him. We wanted to out-do him). The client didn't have a pen and ended up using peanut butter. I'm not sure how that happened, but I remember the client was enjoying himself. He was one of the happiest clients I've seen in the bonus room and he was just there for enjoyment. He knew he was likely to lose his assets and he didn't care. Great client all round. Yes he was obviously. It comes down to reasonable perceptions. Would you want a loved one to be subjected to similar abuse in a computer game? The majority of people certainly would answer in the negative.
One can surmise the intentions of Erotica quite easily by their actions. A normal person listening to the recording would reasonably be expected to conclude that the intention of the people in the recording was to humiliate, abuse, insult, tease and make fun of this person. A reasonable person when asked if that would constitute an intention to cause harm to that person would very likely respond in the affirmative.
Stop trying to justify your unjustifiable behavior by calling the victim a 'client', you don't fool me and you likely don't fool even yourself. Your behavior is extremely poor and this is probably a wake up call for you to reassess it. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1964
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 08:20:00 -
[35] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Yes he was obviously. It comes down to reasonable perceptions. Would you want a loved one to be subjected to similar abuse in a computer game? If they're a functioning adult, I wouldn't care. If they're someone who relies on support, like a child, then I'd supervise their online activities and not allow them to get into that kind of situation. Quote:A normal person listening to the recording would reasonably be expected to conclude that the intention of the people in the recording was to humiliate, abuse, insult, tease and make fun of this person. So? Quote:A reasonable person when asked if that would constitute an intention to cause harm to that person would very likely respond in the affirmative. A reasonable person would not make such presumptions based on such little evidence. Quote:Stop trying to justify your unjustifiable behavior by calling the victim a 'client', you don't fool me and you likely don't fool even yourself. Your behavior is extremely poor and this is probably a wake up call for you to reassess it. Why would I want to justify it? It is what it is, I don't need approval. Lol. Sorry but you idiots not only recorded the 'evidence' you then released it into the public domain so everyone could listen to it. There's a good 2 hours of evidence which clearly shows that you intended to cause harm by humiliating, abusing, teasing (including the persons speech impediment) and making fun of this person for your enjoyment.
It clearly shows laughing and snide comments regarding the victims and his wife's upset reactions. There is no doubt at all that the people involved intended to cause, knew they caused and despite that continued to cause harm.
Don't try to slime your way out of it through pretense of ignorance.
As for your not needing approval, I think its clear that either a) you're all sociopathic, people incapable of caring and empathy, or more likely b) have low self esteem and you're making up for it by trying to outdo each other in a sad game of "lets feel more powerful by denigrating someone". Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1966
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 08:33:00 -
[36] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote: They're both pretty much the same thing. That's how sociopaths work.
You should know what you're talking about before you post. Sociopaths usually have very good self esteem. They unfortunately lack the ability to empathize with their victims and lack the ability for self reflection. Empathy is that feeling you get when you're being mean and you suddenly imagine yourself in the persons shoes and feel guilty.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1970
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 08:39:00 -
[37] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Riot Girl wrote: They're both pretty much the same thing. That's how sociopaths work.
You should know what you're talking about before you post. Sociopaths usually have very good self esteem. They unfortunately lack the ability to empathize with their victims and lack the ability for self reflection. Empathy is that feeling you get when you're being mean and you suddenly imagine yourself in the persons shoes and feel guilty. Do you get a specific feeling when you so frequently post blatant lies on these forums? "Sociopath" ceased to be a thing a while back. :)
I was unaware they had cured people with sociopathic tendencies. Care to post a link? Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1970
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 08:41:00 -
[38] - Quote
Anomaly One wrote:Cjtirith wrote:Ok, here's another angle :
Would it be a problem if the act in question was published on the front page of a newspaper? in the sense that there would be a general outcry of the majority of the population, and a strong backlash. (and this is not just used for emails)
If the answer is yes, then CCP must address it, because without a response there *will* be more widespread publicity over this incident, just as B-R got widespread publicity.
Also, coming from the finance industry I'm very tempted to go fish for the contact information of CCP's investors and see how THEY would react if CCP did nothing... the problem is, no one would have noticed this, no one really cares, it's not something new, and even if they did it's not that big of a deal, but you can't expect people to think clearly after they read this guys blog, the only reason this got so much attention is because of that damned blog and his choice of words and people waiting to jump on a bandwagon. combined with Erotica 1 reputation, his persona, peoples hate for scamming and all that crap about gankers/scammers/new order with the fuel that the guy from CSM poured all over it, it's very clear where this thread was going and what his goal was. If we would go back in time, post just the recording, and say "look what erotica 1 did" this thread would now be 10-20 pages max. with propaganda you can make anything an issue, hell a slap on the wrist with the right choice of words the right person to say them with the correct syntax and of course the right pitchforkers can make it seem like you were physically raped... I don't even need to say anything else because i'm 100% sure that if it was anyone other than Ripard Teg condemning them and anyone other than Erotica 1 and co. on the other side, not one single **** (by anyone, or maybe just a few) would be given. Given the response I think its pretty clear that the majority of players do not want this behavior occurring in and around EvE. Enough said, time for CCP to give players what they want rather than cater to the small group of sadists they currently cater to. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1970
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 08:43:00 -
[39] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:I have never, anywhere, said that I am lawyer. I can however freely say that I am a plumber or lumberjack, even if I am not.
I ask again, what exactly are the tasks required of the victim in order to win the bonus room? I don't think you can win it unless they decide they want you to. Like somebody said earlier, Erotica has had some people in there for 6 hours so they're goal is to grind you down until you lose. No winning allowed. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1970
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 08:45:00 -
[40] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Riot Girl wrote: They're both pretty much the same thing. That's how sociopaths work.
You should know what you're talking about before you post. Sociopaths usually have very good self esteem. They unfortunately lack the ability to empathize with their victims and lack the ability for self reflection. Empathy is that feeling you get when you're being mean and you suddenly imagine yourself in the persons shoes and feel guilty. Do you get a specific feeling when you so frequently post blatant lies on these forums? "Sociopath" ceased to be a thing a while back. :) I was unaware they had cured people with sociopathic tendencies. Care to post a link? ... you really are that stupid/ignorant, aren't you? Sociopathy as a term was eliminated recently, rolled into antisocial personality disorder. No I'm not stupid Walrus. I'm actually pretty intelligent. Perhaps in your part of the world they no longer use the term sociopath but in Australia its still very commonly used, especially by the public, of which I am a member. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1983
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 10:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
Drakast wrote:Jarod Garamonde wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:I ask again, what exactly are the tasks required of the victim in order to win the bonus room? It never ends. No one ever wins. The hosts of this Bonus Room keep moving the goal posts forever by tacking on endless chores. The idea is the player will always give up in the end, thus making it look like it is their own fault. That's not *entirely* accurate. I'm not at liberty to say what constitutes a winner, and what, precisely, they recieve.... but there HAVE been winners, and they DO end up quite spacerich. total bollox. there are no winners just the bullshat belief that there is a chance of winning, there never was a chance at winning. but no one would play if they knew that. so these scammming idiots have to foster the belief that you can win. even though they never will. i give up with you lot. anyone want to buy some land on the moon? Sunny side? Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1990
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 19:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
This thread is reaching the end of its natural life.
This thread has had its stability critically disrupted by the mass of numerous ***** passing through and is on the verge of collapse. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1992
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 04:24:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Kristalll wrote:Cha'ka Khan wrote:
Good comment is good....
As a side note.... Has anyone considered what the original guy thinks of all this attention? How the entirety of the community is now using him as a pawn? (Just a thought)
We have (allegedly) had an agent get in touch with him and Sohkar said that it was all behind him until Ripard posted the blog post. He said (allegedly) that he wished Ripard had asked his permission, and that he was kicked from his highsec corp because they didn't like the attention. But we ARE trying to get him on teamspeak RIGHT NOW to talk with Erotica 1 about this whole thing: http://www.twitch.tv/kristallnachte/This could be VERY enlightening! Ive been saying this since the beginning Ripard has done more harm than any scam or bonus room shenanigans would have. Its frankly the most disgusting portion of the whole ordeal. The issue is not about the person its about the actions of a group of players towards another player. Just because afterwards someone feels embarrassed and says "its ok" doesn't make the actions ok.
The focus should be on Erotica and the people in the chat and their actions. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1996
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:26:00 -
[44] - Quote
Navi Annages wrote:Ripard Teg where have you run off to? You come into this thread specifically to poke at the fire a few times and then run away when your presence is requested on a TS3 server with Erotica 1 and Sohkar Live on twich. I'm unsure as to exactly what kinda of mongering low life CSM you really are for posting such a wonderful piece of negative journalism. http://evenews24.com/2014/03/25/jesters-trek-the-bonus-round/If this is what we can expect from current CSM's trying to actively damage the eve community then I honestly propose that CSM Ripard Teg be removed from his position BEFORE the upcoming CSM POLLS. In my opinion Ripard Teg has overstepped his position of power in an attempt to disrupt and or influence the eve community for his own agenda. Ripard Teg calls for Bans on Erotica 1 and any escrow agents involved. Then in response to overuse of his power he should walk away from CSM in shame either by choice of resignation or by forceful removal. God wills it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU Sorry but the issue is not done and dusted.
What was done was against the rules (harassment), damaged CCP's reputation (only have to check the MMO boards to see the response), and if nothing is done to prevent this sort of thing occurring then it will happen again and potentially someone could be harmed, either one of the perpetrators in RL or the victim through self harm.
More disturbingly one of the perpetrators stated in this thread that they're actively competing against other people also doing the same thing and so they're being forced to 'outdo' each other which means the abuse will take the slippery slope of stupidity and potentially become much more serious with more serious consequences.
If CCP does not act on their duty of care towards their playerbase now they are aware of the problem then they could be liable for a portion of any damages if someone did sue. CCP gains nothing but negative publicity and the potential to be sued if they don't act.
They cannot now claim they were not knowledgeable about the activity as a defense.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1996
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:-beating a dead horse-
Cling to those straws you're reaching for. Cling to them. They're facts. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1996
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:37:00 -
[46] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Xuixien wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:-beating a dead horse-
Cling to those straws you're reaching for. Cling to them. They're facts. Then you can prove them. So, go for it. I suggest you read this thread and listen to the recording. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1996
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:38:00 -
[47] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Sorry but the issue is not done and dusted.
What was done was against the rules (harassment), damaged CCP's reputation (only have to check the MMO boards to see the response), and if nothing is done to prevent this sort of thing occurring then it will happen again and potentially someone could be harmed, either one of the perpetrators in RL or the victim through self harm.
More disturbingly one of the perpetrators stated in this thread that they're actively competing against other people also doing the same thing and so they're being forced to 'outdo' each other which means the abuse will take the slippery slope of stupidity and potentially become much more serious with more serious consequences.
If CCP does not act on their duty of care towards their playerbase now they are aware of the problem then they could be liable for a portion of any damages if someone did sue. CCP gains nothing but negative publicity and the potential to be sued if they don't act.
They cannot now claim they were not knowledgeable about the activity as a defense.
What ruined CCP's reputation (if at all) was the Jester Trek article being picked up and spread around the MMO community. An article that tonight we found was entirely baseless in its positions. Sohkar has gone on the record saying as much. He has also stated that he doesn't appreciate the article Ripard wrote, nor does he appreciate this 300 page thread about it. Sohkar mentioned that he got over the loss of his assets already, he got back on his feet made some ISK and was happy and content playing with his corpmates and doing whatever it is he does within this game, and this all changed once Ripard took it upon himself, without Sohkars permission, to make a big old article about how awful Sohkars experience was, an article that went softly viral through the MMO community. Erotica 1 and scamming didn't tarnish CCP's reputation, Ripard Tegs completely off base article did that. An article he had absolutely no business writing at all. Reporting something factual doesn't harm CCP's reputation. The act that was reported did.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1996
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:40:00 -
[48] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Xuixien wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:-beating a dead horse-
Cling to those straws you're reaching for. Cling to them. They're facts. They are in fact not. They are opinions that people have (badly) tried to back up by quoting the EULA and the dictionary. Fail. No they're facts. Substantiated by the recording and admissions by the perpetrators in this thread. The responsibility for CCP to exercise a duty of care is a well established legal requirement. Vicarious liability is a well established legal principle. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1996
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:44:00 -
[49] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Navi Annages wrote:Ripard Teg where have you run off to? You come into this thread specifically to poke at the fire a few times and then run away when your presence is requested on a TS3 server with Erotica 1 and Sohkar Live on twich. I'm unsure as to exactly what kinda of mongering low life CSM you really are for posting such a wonderful piece of negative journalism. http://evenews24.com/2014/03/25/jesters-trek-the-bonus-round/If this is what we can expect from current CSM's trying to actively damage the eve community then I honestly propose that CSM Ripard Teg be removed from his position BEFORE the upcoming CSM POLLS. In my opinion Ripard Teg has overstepped his position of power in an attempt to disrupt and or influence the eve community for his own agenda. Ripard Teg calls for Bans on Erotica 1 and any escrow agents involved. Then in response to overuse of his power he should walk away from CSM in shame either by choice of resignation or by forceful removal. God wills it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU Sorry but the issue is not done and dusted. What was done was against the rules (harassment), damaged CCP's reputation (only have to check the MMO boards to see the response), and if nothing is done to prevent this sort of thing occurring then it will happen again and potentially someone could be harmed, either one of the perpetrators in RL or the victim through self harm. More disturbingly one of the perpetrators stated in this thread that they're actively competing against other people also doing the same thing and so they're being forced to 'outdo' each other which means the abuse will take the slippery slope of stupidity and potentially become much more serious with more serious consequences. If CCP does not act on their duty of care towards their playerbase now they are aware of the problem then they could be liable for a portion of any damages if someone did sue. CCP gains nothing but negative publicity and the potential to be sued if they don't act. They cannot now claim they were not knowledgeable about the activity as a defense. So let me ask you this question... I know what goes on there.. so do many others who have read the thing on these forums linking to previous Bonus Rooms. Should they be banned for knowing and not saying anything? Should I be banned because I was in the same BU TS Server a few channels in my Corp Channel? If broad strokes need to be taken they sure as hell need to make sure they catch all you idiots that have posted and fuelled this personal attack. I don't think anyone should be banned. I think CCP should ensure that players do not source victims from EVE, using EVE, to do what they did, nor should they after doing it be allowed to post it on the EVE forums.
If they want to source victims from a 3rd party board, do it on TS, and then post back to the 3rd party board, that's not CCP's problem. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1998
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:46:00 -
[50] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: I've been reading this forum since page 1, and I've listened to the recording four times now.
Still yet to see any proof of your assertions, so....
waiting.
FYI, circumstantial substantiation is not proof. You should learn what acceptable standards of evidence are required to prove assertions before asserting they've been proven.
Then you have problems with your comprehension skills. Nothing much that can be done for that here on the board. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1998
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:52:00 -
[51] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: I've been reading this forum since page 1, and I've listened to the recording four times now.
Still yet to see any proof of your assertions, so....
waiting.
FYI, circumstantial substantiation is not proof. You should learn what acceptable standards of evidence are required to prove assertions before asserting they've been proven.
Then you have problems with your comprehension skills. Nothing much that can be done for that here on the board. If you are making an assertion, it is up to you to communicate and prove said assertion succinctly, not question the comprehension skills of the people you are trying to prove it to. This is a cop out. You have proven nothing and you're just waffling on and dodging now, driven by pure bile and hate and lies and nothing more, as per your usual style. It's okay, we're not actually expecting you to be a bigger person at all, we all know you won't be able to prove what you're asserting because you're just not asserting facts. Yeah I'm driven by pure hate. That's why I said I don't believe anyone should be banned, only safeguards put in place. That's pure hate :)
IMO you're driven by a desire to defend your methods of RL harming people for your own sick self gratification and I think that part of you is rather despicable.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2003
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 05:56:00 -
[52] - Quote
Kristalll wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Yeah I'm driven by pure hate. That's why I said I don't believe anyone should be banned, only safeguards put in place. That's pure hate :)
IMO you're driven by a desire to defend your methods of RL harming people for your own sick self gratification and I think that part of you is rather despicable.
Except NOBODY was harmed. I disagree. Harm is not purely physical. Harm can be also pyschological. Harm doesn't have to be permanent, it can be temporary. If someone spits on you in the street and you go home and shower was no harm done? If someone deliberately makes your day miserable at work and you go home and later feel better was no harm done? In both cases harm was done, it was just not permanent and so you couldn't find a remedy in a court for that but its still harm. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2003
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 06:01:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: I disagree. Harm is not purely physical. Harm can be also pyschological. Harm doesn't have to be permanent, it can be temporary. If someone spits on you in the street and you go home and shower was no harm done? If someone deliberately makes your day miserable at work and you go home and later feel better was no harm done? In both cases harm was done, it was just not permanent and so you couldn't find a remedy in a court for that but its still harm.
Be silent you hateful yardle-curdler You harm us all with your souless, tastless, utterly utterly pointless nonsense This matter is at an end And yes, I am angry Because all you do is cause trouble and grizzle at people You unpleasant wretch 2. Be respectful toward others at all times.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.22. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.1ST OFFENCE GÇô WARNING 2ND OFFENCE GÇô 14 DAY SUSPENSION 3RD OFFENCE GÇô 30 DAY SUSPENSION 4TH OFFENCE GÇô 90 DAY SUSPENSION 5TH OFFENCE GÇô 180 DAY SUSPENSION 6+ OFFENCES GÇô 180 DAY SUSPENSION (OR PERMANENT BAN IF TRANSGRESSION IS SEVERE ENOUGH) Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2003
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 06:06:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: I disagree. Harm is not purely physical. Harm can be also pyschological. Harm doesn't have to be permanent, it can be temporary. If someone spits on you in the street and you go home and shower was no harm done? If someone deliberately makes your day miserable at work and you go home and later feel better was no harm done? In both cases harm was done, it was just not permanent and so you couldn't find a remedy in a court for that but its still harm.
Be silent you hateful yardle-curdler You harm us all with your souless, tastless, utterly utterly pointless nonsense This matter is at an end And yes, I am angry Because all you do is cause trouble and grizzle at people You unpleasant wretch 2. Be respectful toward others at all times. The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others. 4. Personal attacks are prohibited. Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.22. Post constructively. Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.1ST OFFENCE GÇô WARNING 2ND OFFENCE GÇô 14 DAY SUSPENSION 3RD OFFENCE GÇô 30 DAY SUSPENSION 4TH OFFENCE GÇô 90 DAY SUSPENSION 5TH OFFENCE GÇô 180 DAY SUSPENSION 6+ OFFENCES GÇô 180 DAY SUSPENSION (OR PERMANENT BAN IF TRANSGRESSION IS SEVERE ENOUGH) Oh shut your face God I hate your garbage so so so much I DONT CARE DO YOU HEAR 2. Be respectful toward others at all times.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.22. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.1ST OFFENCE GÇô WARNING 2ND OFFENCE GÇô 14 DAY SUSPENSION 3RD OFFENCE GÇô 30 DAY SUSPENSION 4TH OFFENCE GÇô 90 DAY SUSPENSION 5TH OFFENCE GÇô 180 DAY SUSPENSION 6+ OFFENCES GÇô 180 DAY SUSPENSION (OR PERMANENT BAN IF TRANSGRESSION IS SEVERE ENOUGH) Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2003
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 06:15:00 -
[55] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote: So how far past 6 are you now in this thread? lol
When I first started EVE I let people get to me on the forums but then I grew up, got a job, got married, had kids.
I realised that the government expected me to give them 45% of my earnings + 10% GST on top + registration + tax my petrol 45% + tax my cigarettes around 300% + tax my alcohol 60%.
I realised that girlfriends who turn into wives are massively annoying and troll me much more than any forum user ever could.
At that point I ceased to able to be annoyed by the EVE online forums and started using it as a way to relax. Relaxing in a nice troll thread helps me survive life. Why would I need to be offensive or abusive to you wonderful people. I feel like buying you all beer. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2007
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 06:30:00 -
[56] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Erotica 1 wrote: So how far past 6 are you now in this thread? lol
When I first started EVE I let people get to me on the forums but then I grew up, got a job, got married, had kids. I realised that the government expected me to give them 45% of my earnings + 10% GST on top + registration + tax my petrol 45% + tax my cigarettes around 300% + tax my alcohol 60%. I realised that girlfriends who turn into wives are massively annoying and troll me much more than any forum user ever could. At that point I ceased to able to be annoyed by the EVE online forums and started using it as a way to relax. Relaxing in a nice troll thread helps me survive life. Why would I need to be offensive or abusive to you wonderful people. I feel like buying you all beer. So you confess you're just trolling. Thanks for the clarity. I said "a nice troll thread", not "a nice troll thread of my making" Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2009
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 09:13:00 -
[57] - Quote
Once again, whether its now okay or not with the victim the line was crossed and cannot be uncrossed. If you're drink driving and don't kill anyone does that make it okay? No.
How much they paid him to be "okay with it" if they did, which is very highly likely given their questionable eithics is irrelevant.
This thread-naught, the multiple blogs, the posts on MMORPG, Massively and the rest slamming EVE, CCP, the player base and the potential harm that it COULD HAVE CAUSED is the main issue.
As an aside I found it pretty amusing that someone... can't say who seems to have gone around and posted on sites that its suddenly okay, that the person who reported it is the evil one and oh yeah, could you please lock and delete these now... lol
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2012
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 09:17:00 -
[58] - Quote
Coffee Rocks wrote:Erotica 1 wrote:Coffee Rocks wrote:Erotica 1 wrote:You guys know how/why I was vouched into Goons right?
I know that you were kicked out for being "too creepy", among other amusing adjectives. nope. that is an often repeated lie to make gullible people believe it. I have addressed this at length. I never thought the following sentence would ever leave my mouth ;) I believe Mynnna over you everyday of the week, as should anyone with an ounce of common sense You'd have to be really really creepy to get kicked out of Goons for being creepy. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2014
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 09:25:00 -
[59] - Quote
Asia Leigh wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Once again, whether its now okay or not with the victim the line was crossed and cannot be uncrossed. If you're drink driving and don't kill anyone does that make it okay? No.
How much they paid him to be "okay with it" if they did, which is very highly likely given their questionable eithics is irrelevant.
This thread-naught, the multiple blogs, the posts on MMORPG, Massively and the rest slamming EVE, CCP, the player base is damage and the potential harm that it COULD HAVE CAUSED is the main issue.
As an aside I found it pretty amusing that someone... can't say who seems to have gone around and posted on sites that its suddenly okay, the victim is not upset, that the person who reported it is the evil one and oh yeah, could you please lock and delete these now... lol *facepalm* Have you listened to last nights stream? And proof he was paid off to play nice? We wouldn't want to throw around baseless assumptions, now would we? I'm not interested in damage control and propaganda. I listened to the whole original recording. I don't have to provide proof since I wrote "if they did". Like I said its highly likely they would stoop to that level given their reputations for being scammers, liars and general asshats.
Disclaimer: before you cry "personal attack" I said "given their reputations for being" which they cultivated themselves. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2014
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 09:27:00 -
[60] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:Infinity, you still have not answered my repeated questions over numerous threads.
Your personality and viewpoints took dramatic turns in the forums for anyone who cares to analyze your post history. I half joking asked if you sold your character and you never responded even with a troll.
Thoughts? They took dramatic turns because I'm a person that strives to learn from my past. Your veiled personal attack and insinuation that I sold my character tells me you'd not very happy with my derailing your new scam - the Lets Pretend Nothing Happened and It Was All a Big Misunderstanding Scam. Go spam it in Jita for stupid people to buy. We're not buying it here.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2014
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 09:30:00 -
[61] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:I'm glad Sokhar spoke out about this, it really exposed how disgusting Ripard Teg and his Moral Bunch actually are.
When the "victim" himself says it was just an overreaction, and that he's not bothered by it, it says volumes about the moral panic and claims of abuse and torture and blahblah.
It's also rather repugnant that Ripard Teg and his Moral Bunch would attempt to exploit a player who had been scammed - but got over it - and use him in their political machinations, especially when the player himself didn't want that to happen, and has suffered negative consequences of what they did.
After 7000 posts we really know who the toxic members of this community are, and the rep they have on the CSM. Golf Claps... You wouldn't happen to be a former Iraqi Information Minister would you :) Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2016
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 10:49:00 -
[62] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:I'm glad Sokhar spoke out about this, it really exposed how disgusting Ripard Teg and his Moral Bunch actually are.
When the "victim" himself says it was just an overreaction, and that he's not bothered by it, it says volumes about the moral panic and claims of abuse and torture and blahblah.
It's also rather repugnant that Ripard Teg and his Moral Bunch would attempt to exploit a player who had been scammed - but got over it - and use him in their political machinations, especially when the player himself didn't want that to happen, and has suffered negative consequences of what they did.
After 7000 posts we really know who the toxic members of this community are, and the rep they have on the CSM. Golf Claps... You wouldn't happen to be a former Iraqi Information Minister would you :) Do you not realise how intellectually dishonest and morally bankrupt it is to make such comparisons? Do you not understand that you just proved the point I made exactly? You, and Ripard Teg, and numerous others, attempt to demonise players you personally don't by like directly comparing them to heinous individuals who have caused real, serious human suffering. Do you not realise how that is not only a repulsive, pathetic strategy in an argument, but that it also trivialises the real human suffering you reference? That is exactly why you are toxic to this community. No, I was just comparing your ability to try to spread propaganda with his. AFAIK he didn't do anything wrong. He was just the information minister. Probably a good guy... Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |
| |
|